Thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic results on repeat fine-needle aspiration biopsy: which nodules should be considered for repeat biopsy or surgery rather than follow-up?

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to assess the clinicopathologic and ultrasonographic features of thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic results on repeat ultrasonography (US)-guided fineneedle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) according to size and the number of suspicious findings and to determine the proper management of nodules with consecutive nondiagnostic results. METHODS: This retrospective study included 297 nodules with nondiagnostic results on repeat FNAB that were evaluated by US over the course of at least 12 months of follow-up, a follow-up biopsy, or an operation. We compared clinical and US variables between benign and malignant nodules in thyroid nodules with repeat nondiagnostic results. RESULTS: The comparison of benign and malignant nodules with repeat nondiagnostic results revealed that age, marked hypoechogenicity, irregular or microlobulated margins, microcalcifications, and nonparallel shape were significantly associated with malignancy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis in malignant nodules revealed that microcalcifications and irregular or microlobulated margins were independently associated with malignancy. Among them, only irregular or microlobulated margins were independently significant as a predictor of malignancy in repeatedly nondiagnostic nodules measuring >10 mm. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the best cutoff value for the "number of suspicious findings" between benign and malignant nodules was three in nodules of all sizes, three in nodules measuring ≤10 mm, and two in nodules measuring >10 mm. CONCLUSION: Irregular or microlobulated margins may be the most frequent US features in repeatedly nondiagnostic nodules >10 mm. The presence of "two or more suspicious findings" can be used as the cutoff for distinguishing benign and malignant nodules.

Thyroid nodules with Bethesda System IV Cytology: Can Ultrasonography Differentiate Malignancy from Benign?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify clinical and imaging parameters that can be used in differentiation of benign versus malignancy of preoperative FNA diagnosis of Bethesda system IV nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed clinical, ultrasonographic, and CT findings of 28 thyroid nodules with Bethesda system IV cytology on FNA, which were proven as follicular or Hurthle cell neoplasms on surgical pathology. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences according to age, sex, and ultrasonographic parameters, including echogenicity, margin, calcification, shape, cystic component, and degree of vascularity and enhancement on CT were observed between benign and malignant follicular neoplasms. Only the lesion size was significantly different (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The size of follicular neoplasm is predictive of malignancy. If a thyroid nodule with the Bethesda IV cytology is larger than 24.5 mm, there will be a greater probability of malignancy.